SANTAYANA, GEORGE

From “The Sense of Beauty: Being an Outline of Aesthetic Theory”

 

·        Speculation is an evil if it imposes a for­eign organization on our mental life; it is a good if it only brings to light, and makes more per­fect by training, the organization already inherent in it.

 

·        In certain moments of contempla­tion, when much emotional experience lies behind us, and we have reached very general ideas both of nature and of life, our delight in any par­ticular object may consist in nothing but the thought that this object is a manifestation of universal principles.

 

·        If we combine the etymological mean­ing of criticism with that of aesthetics, we shall unite two essential qualities of the theory of beauty.  Criticism implies judgment, and aesthetics perception. 

 

·        We can see in a mechanical world no element of value whatever.  In removing consciousness, we have removed the possibility of worth.

 

·        For the existence of good in any form it is not merely consciousness but emotional con­sciousness that is needed.  Observation will not do, appreciation is required.

 

·        As Spinoza clearly expresses it, we desire nothing be­cause it is good, but it is good only because we desire it.

 

·        Unless there is in us some trace of passionate reprobation or of sensible delight, there is no moral or aesthetic judgment. 

 

·        Values spring from the immediate and inex­plicable reaction of vital impulse, and from the irrational part of our nature. The rational part is by its essence relative; it leads us from data to conclusions, or from parts to wholes; it never furnishes the data with which it works.  If any preference or precept were declared to be ultimate and primitive, it would thereby be declared to be irrational, since mediation, inference, and syn­thesis are the essence of rationality.  

 

·        Science is the response to the demand for information, and in it we ask for the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  Art is the response to the demand for entertainment, for the stimulation of our senses and imagination, and truth enters into it only as it sub-serves these ends.

 

·        Intuition runs equally into truth and into error, and can settle nothing if not controlled by expe­rience.

 

·        Aesthetic and moral judgments are accordingly to be classed together in contrast to judgments intellectual; they are both judgments of value, while intellectual judgments are judgments of fact.  If the latter have any value, it is only derivative, and our whole intellectual life has its only justification in its connection with our pleasures and pains.

 

·        While aesthetic judgments are mainly positive – i.e. perceptions of good - moral judgments are mainly and fundamentally negative, or perceptions of evil.

 

·        Morality is not mainly concerned with the attainment of pleasure; it is rather con­cerned, in all its deeper and more authoritative maxims, with the prevention of suffering. 

 

·        It is in the spontaneous play of his faculties that man finds himself and his happi­ness. 

 

·        To the exercise of certain useful habits men come to sacrifice the advantage which was the original basis and justification of those habits.  Minute knowledge is pursued at the expense of largeness of mind, and riches at the expense of comfort and freedom.

 

·        In other pleasures, it is said, we gratify our senses and passions; in the contemplation of beauty we are raised above ourselves, the pas­sions are silenced and we are happy in the recognition of a good that we do not seek to possess. 

 

·        People who have no sen­sations, and do not know why they judge, are always trying to show that they judge by uni­versal reason.

 

·        Beauty is a value; it cannot be conceived as an independent existence which affects our senses and which we consequently perceive.  It exists in perception, and cannot exist otherwise.  A beauty not perceived is a pleasure not felt, and a contra­diction.    

 

·        All worth leads us back to actual feeling somewhere, or else evaporates into nothing - into a word and a superstition.

 

·        Every idea that is formed in the human mind, every activity and emotion, has some relation - direct or indirect - to pain and pleasure.

 

·        A certain musical phrase, as it were, is played in the brain; the awakening of that echo is the act of apperception and the harmony of the present stimulation with the form of that phrase; the power of this particular object to develop and intensify that generic phrase in the direction of pleasure, is the test of the formal beauty of this example.  For these cerebral phrases have a cer­tain rhythm; this rhythm can, by the influence of the stimulus that now reawakens it, be marred or enriched, be made more or less marked and deli­cate; and as this conflict or reinforcement comes, the object is ugly or beautiful in form.

 

·                                                                      The world is so much more beau­tiful to a poet or an artist than to an ordinary man. Each object, as his aesthetic sense is developed, is perhaps less beautiful than to the uncritical eye; his taste becomes difficult, and only the very best gives him unalloyed satisfaction. But while each work of nature and art is thus apparently blighted by his greater demands and keener susceptibility, the world itself - and the various natures it contains - are to him unspeakably beautiful. The more blemishes he can see in men, the more excellence he sees in man, and the more bitterly he laments the fate of each particular soul, the more reverence and love he has for the soul in its ideal essence.  Criticism and idealization involve each other.  The habit of looking for beauty in everything makes us notice the shortcomings of things; our sense, hungry for complete satisfaction, misses the perfection it de­mands.  But this demand for perfection becomes at the same time the nucleus of our observation; from every side a quick affinity draws what is beau­tiful together and stores it in the mind, giving body there to the blind yearnings of our nature.  Many imperfect things crystallize into a single perfec­tion.  The mind is thus peopled by general ideas in which beauty is the chief quality; and these ideas are at the same time the types of things. The type is still a natural resultant of particular im­pressions; but the formation of it has been guided by a deep subjective bias in favor of what has delighted the eye.

 

·        The princi­ple of personal preference is the same as that of human taste; real and objective beauty, in contrast to a vagary of individuals, means only an affinity to a more prevalent and lasting susceptibility, a response to a more general and fundamental de­mand.  And the keener discrimination, by which the distance between beautiful and ugly things is increased, far from being a loss of aesthetic insight, is a development of that faculty by the exercise of which beauty comes into the world.

 

·        It is the free exercise of the activity of appreciation that gives so peculiar an interest to indeterminate objects, to the vague, the incoherent, the sugges­tive, the variously interpretable.  The more this effect is appealed to, the greater wealth of thought is presumed in the observer, and the less mastery is displayed by the artist.  A poor and literal mind cannot enjoy the opportunity for reverie and construction given by the stimulus of indetermi­nate objects; it lacks the requisite resources. 

 

·        A landscape to be seen has to be composed, and to be loved has to be moralized.

 

·        In fact, psychologically speaking, there is no such thing as a landscape; what we call such is an infinity of different scraps and glimpses given in succession.  Even a painted landscape, although it tends to select and emphasize some parts of the field, is composed by adding together a multitude of views. When this painting is observed in its turn, it is surveyed as a real landscape would be, and apperceived partially and piecemeal; although, of course, it offers much less wealth of material than its living original, and is therefore vastly inferior.

 

·        What we love is the stimulation of our own personal emotions and dreams; and landscape appeals to us, as music does to those who have no sense for musical form.

 

·        Whenever beauty is really seen and loved, it has a definite embodiment: the eye has precision, the work has style, and the object has perfection. 

 

·        The illusion of infinite perfection is peculiarly apt to produce the sensa­tion of profundity and significance.  That illusion arises by the simultaneous awakening of many incipient thoughts and dim ideas; it stirs the depths of the mind as a wind stirs the thickets of a forest; and the unusual consciousness of the life and longing of the soul, brought by that gust of feeling, makes us recog­nize in the object a singular power, a mysterious meaning.

 

·        Progress lies in the direction of discrimination and precision, not in that of formless emotion and reverie.

 

·        One of the dangers to which a modern artist is exposed is the seduction of his prede­cessors.  The groapings of our muse, the distracted experiments of our architecture, often arise from the attraction of some historical school; we cannot work out our own style because we are ham­pered by the beauties of so many others. The result is an eclecticism, which, in spite of its great histori­cal and psychological interest, is without aesthetic unity or permanent power to please.  Thus the study of many schools of art may become an obsta­cle to proficiency in any.

 

·        No lan­guage can be ugly to those who speak it well, no religion unmeaning to those who have learned to pour their life into its moulds. Of course these forms vary in intrinsic excellence; they are by their specific character more or less fit and facile for the average mind. But the man and the age are rare who can choose their own path; we have generally only a choice between going ahead in the direction already chosen, or halting and blocking the path for others. 

 

·        Unless human nature suffers an inconceivable change, the chief intel­lectual and aesthetic value of our ideas will always come from the creative action of the imagination.

 

·        Expression depends upon the union of two terms, one of which must be fur­nished by the imagination; and a mind cannot furnish what it does not possess. The expressiveness of everything accordingly increases with the intelligence of the observer.

 

·        There is no noble sorrow except in a noble mind, because what is noble is the reaction upon the sorrow, the attitude of the man in its presence, the language in which he clothes it, the associa­tions with which he surrounds it, and the fine affections and impulses which shine through it. Only by suffusing some sinister experience with this moral light, as a poet may do who carries that light within him, can we raise misfortune into tragedy and make it better for us to remember our lives than to forget them.

 

·        Our practical and intellectual nature is deeply inter­ested in truth.  What describes fact appeals to us for that reason; it has an inalienable interest. However unpleasant truth may prove, we long to know it, partly perhaps because experience has shown us the prudence of this kind of intellectual courage, and chiefly because the consciousness of ignorance and the dread of the unknown is more tormenting than any possible discovery.  A primi­tive instinct makes us turn the eyes full on any object that appears in the dim borderland of our field of vision - and this all the more quickly, the more terrible that object threatens to be.

 

·        Many tragedies and farces, that to a mind without experience of this sublunary world might seem monstrous and disgusting fictions, may come to be forgiven and even perhaps preferred over all else, when they are found to be a sketch from life.

 

·        A man who is really a student of history or philosophy will never rest with the vague and partial oracles of poetry, not to speak of the inarticulate sugges­tions of the plastic arts.  He will at once make for the principles which art cannot express, even if it can embody them, and when those prin­ciples are attained, the works of art, if they had no other value than that of suggesting them, will lapse from his mind.  Forms will give place to formulas as hieroglyphics have given place to the letters of the alphabet.

 

·        The pathetic is a quality of the object, at once lovable and sad, which we accept and allow to flow in upon the soul; but the heroic is an attitude of the will, by which the voices of the outer world are silenced, and a moral energy, flowing from within, is made to triumph over them.  

 

·        Among the ideas with which every object has relation there is one vaguest, most comprehensive, and most powerful one, namely, the idea of self. The impulses, mem­ories, principles, and energies which we designate by that word baffle enumeration; indeed, they con­stantly fade and change into one another; and whether the self is anything, everything, or noth­ing depends on the aspect of it which we momen­tarily fix, and especially on the definite object with which we contrast it.

 

·        There are always two methods of securing harmony: one is to unify all the given elements, and another is to reject and expunge all the elements that refuse to be unified.  Unity by inclusion gives us the beautiful; unity by exclusion, opposition, and isolation gives us the sublime.  Both are pleasures: but the pleasure of the one is warm, passive, and pervasive; that of the other cold, imperious, and keen.  The one identifies us with the world, the other raises us above it.

 

·        The more intimate to himself the tragedy he is able to look back upon with calmness, the more sublime that calmness is, and the more divine the ecstasy in which he achieves it. For the more of the accidental vesture of life we are able to strip ourselves of, the more naked and simple is the surviving spirit; the more complete its superiority and unity, and, consequently, the more unqualified its joy. There remains little in us, then, but that intellectual essence, which several great philosophers have called eternal and identified with the Divinity.

 

·        When a man knows that his life is over, he can look back upon it from a universal standpoint.  He has nothing more to live for, but if the energy of his mind remains unimpaired, he will still wish to live, and, being cut off from his personal ambitions, he will impute to himself a kind of vicarious immortality by identifying himself with what is eternal.  He speaks of himself as he is, or rather as he was. He sums himself up, and points to his achieve­ment.  This I have been, says he, this I have done.

 

·        This is the attitude of all minds to which breadth of interest or length of years has brought balance and dignity.  The sacerdotal quality of old age comes from this same sympathy in disinterested­ness.  Old men full of hurry and passion appear as fools, because we understand that their expe­rience has not left enough mark upon their brain to qualify with the memory of other goods any object that may be now presented.  We cannot venerate any one in whom appreciation is not divorced from desire.  And this elevation and detachment of the heart need not follow upon any great disappointment; it is finest and sweetest where it is the gradual fruit of many affections now merged and mellowed into a natural piety.

 

·        A thousand originalities are produced by defect of faculty, for one that is pro­duced by genius.  For in the pursuit of beauty, as in that of truth, an infinite number of paths lead to failure, and only one to success.

 

·        The creative and imitative impulse is indiscriminate.  It does not consider the eventual beauty of the effect, but only the blind instinct of self-expression. Hence an untrained and not naturally sensitive mind cannot distinguish or produce anything good.

 

·        Our consciousness of the ideal becomes distinct in proportion as we advance in virtue and in propor­tion to the vigor and definiteness with which our faculties work.  When the vital harmony is com­plete, when the act is pure, faith in perfection passes into vision.  That man is unhappy indeed, who in all his life has had no glimpse of perfec­tion, who in the ecstasy of love, or in the delight of contemplation, has never been able to say: It is attained.  Such moments of inspiration are the source of the arts, which have no higher function than to renew them.

 

·        The eventual decay of our personal energies does not destroy the natural value of objects so long as the same will embodies itself in other minds, and human nature subsists in the world.

 

·        So long as we exist and recognize ourselves individually as persons or collectively as human, we must recognize also our immanent ideal, the realization of which would constitute perfection for us.  That ideal cannot be destroyed except in proportion as we ourselves perish.

 

·        Satisfaction of our reason, due to the harmony between our nature and our experience, is partially realized already. The sense of beauty is its realization. Beauty is a pledge of the possible conformity between the soul and nature, and consequently a ground of faith in the supremacy of the good.

 

Home

Images

The Sublime

Our World and Times

Book Reviews

Our Stories

The Allegories

Gleanings

From The Writings Of. . .

Links