MAN
FOR HIMSELF
(An Enquiry into the Psychology of Ethics)
Dr. Fromm outlines
various forms of character structure and points to how the productive character
drive powers ethical behaviour; that psychology is integral to the ground of
philosophy and ethics, and that people and self cannot be understood without
understanding values and moral conflicts.
A person must know himself and be for himself.
Drawing heavily on the work of
Freud, Jung and Spinoza, with cross-reference to the Greek and Chinese
philosophers and world religions, Fromm strives to give insight into the
natural ongoing 'human' search for enlightenment into the personal ways whereby
a man can understand himself, others and the world. The first step on this path is to face the truth, for a man to
acknowledge his fundamental aloneness and solitude in a universe indifferent to
his fate, to recognize that there is no power transcending him which can solve
his problems - that a person must accept the responsibility for himself and see
that only by using his own powers can he derive meaning in his life. If he faces the truth without panic, he will
recognize that there is no meaning to life except the meaning which he gives his
life by the unfolding of his powers, by living productively.
Only constant vigilance
and effort can keep us from failing in the one task that matters - the full
development of our powers within the limitation set by the laws of our
existence. The mature and productive individual derives his feeling of identity
from the experience of himself as the agent who is one with his powers: this
feeling of self can be briefly expressed as meaning "I am what I
do". A person can experience, see,
feel and think productively without having the gift to create something visual
or communicable. Productiveness is an
attitude which every human being is capable of, unless he is mentally and
emotionally crippled.
The ability of man to
make productive use of his powers is his potency; the inability is his impotency. With his power of reason he can
penetrate the surface of phenomena and understand their essence. With his power of love he can break
thru the wall which separates one person from another. With his power of imagination he can
visualize things not yet existing - he can plan and thus begin to create. Where potency is lacking, man's relatedness
to the world is perverted into a desire to dominate, to exert power over others
as though they were things. Domination
is coupled with death; potency with life.
In Ibsen's play Peer
Gynt; Gynt throughout his life believed that he was acting productively and in
behalf of his self when he used all his energy to make money and to become
successful, according to the principle "Be enough to thyself" vs the human
principle "Be true to thyself".
He discovers at the end of his life that his exploitiveness and egotism
have prevented him from becoming himself, that the realization of self is only
possible if he were truly productive by birthing his own potentialities. In the play, these unrealized potentialities
come to accuse Gynt of his "sin" and point to the real cause of his
human failure and his lack of productiveness.
The
Threadballs (on the ground)
We are thoughts;
You should have thought us;
Little
feet, to life
You should have brought us!
We should have risen
With glorious sound;
But here like threadballs
We are earth-bound.
Withered Leaves
We are a watchword;
You should have used us!
Life, by your sloth,
Has been refused us.
By worms we're eaten
All up and down;
No fruit will have us
For spreading crown.
We are songs
You should have sung us!
In the depths of your heart
Despair has wrung us!
We lay and waited;
You called us not.
May your throat and voice
With poison rot!
We are tears
Which were never shed.
The cutting ice
Which all hearts dread
We could have melted;
But now its dart
Is frozen into
A stubborn heart.
The wound is closed;
Our power is lost.
We are deeds
You have left undone;
Strangled by doubt,
Spoiled ere begun.
At the Judgment Day
We shall be there
To tell our tale;
How will you fare?
Definitions:
Conscience: Freud - a system of commands and prohibitions embodied in the
Father's Super-Ego and cultural tradition (i.e. conscience is internalized
authority).
Humanistic - the voice of our loving care for ourselves: knowledge and guidance from within (as opposed to authoritarian)
as to our individual success or failure in the art of living (the still small
voice within).
Personality: the totality of inherited and acquired psychic qualities which are
characteristic of one individual and which make the individual unique.
Temperament: refers to one's mode of reaction to stimulus and is
constitutional and not changeable. Character
is essentially formed by a person's experiences, especially those in early life
and is changeable, to some extent, by insights and new kinds of
experiences. The expression of one's
character is thru the will. Types of character are:
1. Non-productive
orientation
a) Receiving................Masochistic )
(Accepting) (Loyalty) )
)symbiosis
b) Exploiting...............Sadistic )
(Taking) (Authority) )
c) Hoarding.................Destructive )
(Preserving) (Assertiveness) )
)withdrawal
d) Marketing................Indifferent )
(Exchanging) (Fairness) )
2. Productive
orientation
Working..................Loving,
Reasoning
Respect: is not fear and awe; it denotes, in accordance with the root of the
word (respicere = to look at), the ability to see a person as he is, to be
aware of his individuality and uniqueness.
To respect a person is not possible without knowing him; care and
responsibility would be blind if they were not guided by the knowledge of the
person's individuality.
Pleasure: if true, consists in serenity of mind and the absence of fear, and is
obtained only by one who has prudence and foresight and thus is ready to reject
immediate gratification for the sake of permanent and tranquil satisfaction.
Happiness: is an achievement brought about by one's inner productiveness and not a
gift of the gods. Joy refers to
the feeling deriving from a single act of productiveness while happiness may be
said to be a continuous or integrated experience of joy. (We speak of joys (plural) but of happiness
(singular)).
Hate: A) Rational, reactive hate is a person's reaction to a threat to his
own or another person's freedom, life or ideas - based on the respect for life.
It has an important biological function: to protect one's life, integrity and
freedom, and this form of hate ceases to exist when the threat has been
removed.
B) Irrational character-conditioned hate is a character trait, a
continuous readiness to hate, lingering within the person who is hostile
rather than reacting rationally to outside stimulus - often it is a gratuitous
hate, using every opportunity to be expressed, yet rationalized as sacrifice,
selflessness or inferiority feelings.
Ethics: is primarily concerned with the problem of dealing with irrational
hate, the passion to destroy or cripple life.
A clue to the understanding of these life-destructive energies may be
that the degree of destructiveness is proportionate to the degree to which the
unfolding of a person's capabilities is blocked. If life's tendency to grow, to be lived, is thwarted, the energy
thus blocked undergoes a process of change and is transformed into
life-destructive energy. Destructiveness is the outcome of unlived life. Those individual and social conditions which
make for the blocking of life-furthering energy produce destructiveness which
in turn is the source from which the various manifestations of evil
spring. The evil has no independent
existence of its own, it is the absence of the good, the result of the failure
to realize life. The normal individual
possesses in himself the tendency to develop, to grow and to be productive, and
the paralysis of this tendency is in itself the symptom of mental sickness.
The Moral Power in Man
Man's main task in life
is to give birth to himself, to become what he potentially is. The most important product of his effort is
his own personality. One can judge
objectively to what extent the person has succeeded in his task, to what degree
he has realized his potentialities. If
he failed in his task, one can recognize this failure and judge it for what it
is - his moral failure. Even if one
knows that the odds against the person were overwhelming and that everyone else
would have failed too, the judgment about him remains the same. If one fully understands all the
circumstances which made him as he is, one may have compassion for him; yet this
compassion does not alter the validity of the judgment. Understanding a person does not mean
condoning; it only means that one does not accuse him as if one were God or a
judge placed above him.
Home
|
Our Stories
|
The Sublime
|
Our World and Times
|
Book Reviews
|
Our Images
|
The Journal
|
Gleanings
|
From The Writings Of. . .
|
Allegories
|